Rude Tourist Behavior: 9 Times People Fought Back

I think we have all seen behavior while traveling that can be considered rude. For instance, I once saw people on a beach listening to extremely loud music. It was not music I liked, and judging by the looks around us, many other people were not happy either. Yet no one complained.

Reacting in these situations can be difficult. We may feel intimidated by the people involved, or we may realize that a complaint could turn into a much larger confrontation. When it happens on an airplane, a cruise ship, at a hotel or on an unfamiliar beach, there is also the risk that the situation could escalate or even become physical. Recent cases involving air rage show how one passenger’s behavior can disrupt a trip for everyone.

I think many people decide that saying nothing is safer than discovering how the other person might react. But not everyone walks away.

In fact, I found several cases in which people had finally become fed up with inconsiderate tourists, and some of their responses went pretty far. A few were applauded by thousands of people online. Others created an entirely new problem, and in at least one case, a person who had nothing to do with the original behavior ended up dealing with the consequences.

Then there are the cases in which employees, airlines, cruise companies and residents decided they had had enough too. The incidents happened in different parts of the world, and several began with ordinary tourist behaviors that many people have encountered while traveling.

What happened afterward is why these situations became stories. Let’s take them one by one – there are nine below.

1. Sunbed Hogging Revenge: A Tourist Used Itching Powder on Reserved Towels

ID 412543794 ©Alexander Shapovalov | Dreamstime.com

Sunbed hogging has frustrated hotel guests for years. People wake up early, place towels and personal belongings on the best pool loungers, and then disappear for breakfast, return to bed or spend hours somewhere else. Meanwhile, other guests arrive at the pool and find rows of empty chairs that they’re apparently not allowed to use.

A British holidaymaker staying at a hotel in Majorca decided that simply moving the abandoned towels wasn’t enough.

According to a report published by The Sun, the 31-year-old tourist claimed that he had watched guests repeatedly reserve the same loungers early in the morning before leaving the pool area for hours. He said he spent several days identifying the people he considered repeat offenders.

He then filmed himself putting itching powder on towels that had been left across the loungers.

In one of the reported incidents, a couple allegedly reserved the same pool chairs they had used the previous day. The man did not return until approximately 1:30 p.m. According to the tourist who made the videos, the man began scratching after sitting on the lounger and later jumped into the pool.

The videos reportedly received a combined 864,000 views and more than 13,000 likes. Many viewers enjoyed seeing someone retaliate against guests who reserved sunbeds they were not using, while others said that removing unattended towels would have been understandable but putting a substance on someone else’s belongings went too far.

I understand why sunbed hogging makes people angry. A hotel has a limited number of loungers, and one towel shouldn’t prevent other guests from using a chair for half the day.

However, itching powder is not a harmless solution. The person using the towel could have sensitive skin, an allergy or another condition, and there is no guarantee that the person who eventually touches it is the person who originally reserved the lounger. A child or another family member could use it instead.

Calpe, on Spain’s Costa Blanca, has taken a far less risky approach to the same problem. Under the local beach towel rule, chairs, loungers, parasols and other beach equipment may be removed when they are placed too early or left unattended for several hours.

Municipal workers or the Local Police handle the equipment, so another irritated visitor doesn’t have to decide what to do with someone else’s belongings. It may not produce a video with hundreds of thousands of views, but it is certainly safer than itching powder.

Would you move an abandoned towel, call a hotel employee or leave it exactly where it was?

2. Noisy Hotel Guests Were Sent Chasing a Fake 5 A.M. Breakfast

ID 259333782 ©Info634860 | Dreamstime.com

Noise from another hotel room is difficult to escape. You can’t simply move your chair farther away, as you might on a beach, and repeatedly knocking on the wall can make the situation worse. Even calling reception doesn’t always lead to an immediate solution.

One hotel guest decided to respond to a sleepless night with an elaborate early-morning prank.

In a Reddit post, a father said his family was staying beneath a room occupied by six people. According to his account, the guests above them spent hours banging, moving around and slamming objects, with the noise continuing until well after midnight.

The father woke at approximately 5 a.m. and decided that his neighbors should be awake too. He went to a hotel telephone near the elevators, called the room above and pretended to be an employee making a wake-up call.

He told the sleepy guest who answered that the family had received complimentary breakfast and admission to the hotel water park. There was one condition: they supposedly had to claim the offer at reception within 30 minutes.

The man then waited in the lobby. Approximately 20 minutes later, he claimed the groggy family arrived at the front desk expecting the promised breakfast and water-park access.

The hotel employee had no idea what they were talking about. The conversation reportedly became heated before the family realized that the call had been a prank.

It is easy to understand why a sleep-deprived hotel guest might enjoy this story. The noisy neighbors were forced out of bed early and experienced some of the disruption they had caused the night before. For a few minutes, the plan seemed to have worked exactly as intended.

The problem was that the person who faced their anger at reception had not created the noise and had not made the fake call.

Several readers criticized the prank for involving an innocent employee. One commenter who identified themselves as a hotel worker said the guest should have reported the noise to the front desk instead of creating an additional confrontation for the person working overnight.

Even the person who posted the story later admitted that the effect on the hotel employee had been greater than he anticipated. His revenge had reached the intended guests, but someone else had to deal with the argument.

Hotel employees already have to handle many other forms of inconsiderate guest behavior. In a separate incident, staff discovered how much breakfast food guests had allegedly prepared to take to their room before checking out. That situation eventually reached the evening news.

3. Another Hotel Guest Left a Radio Blasting Static After He Left

The fake breakfast was not the only revenge arranged by a hotel guest who had lost sleep because of noisy neighbors. In another Reddit post, a man said he was staying in a hotel room with a connecting door to the room next door.

A group arrived in the adjoining room and began having a party. At approximately 10 p.m., the man knocked on their door and asked them to keep the noise down because he had to work the following morning.

According to his account, the guests denied being particularly loud. They continued making noise, so he contacted the front desk. He then claimed he heard the telephone ring in the adjoining room, followed by one of the occupants saying that if he thought they were loud already, he should wait until later.

The noise reportedly continued, and the man believed that the group was now making even more of it deliberately. He eventually fell asleep at approximately 1 a.m. and woke at 5:30 to prepare for work.

Before leaving, he plugged the hotel alarm clock into an outlet beside the connecting door. He placed its speaker against the door, tuned the radio between stations, turned the volume to its maximum level and set the alarm to activate five minutes after his departure.

Unlike the man behind the fake-breakfast prank, he did not remain in the hotel to see what happened. He could only imagine the occupants waking to loud static and being unable to enter his room to turn it off.

Many Reddit commenters mentioned similar situations and even similar retaliation methods. Still, the radio wouldn’t necessarily have disturbed only the intended room. Other hotel guests, including people who had been completely silent all night, might have heard it too.

There is another issue here. When reception has already been contacted and the noise continues, how many times should a guest be expected to complain? Should the hotel move the guest who wants to sleep, or should it take stronger action against the people causing the noise?

The prank did not involve an unknown substance or a direct confrontation. It did, however, respond to excessive noise by deliberately creating more noise.

4. Airplane Deboarding Etiquette: A Passenger Blocked People Cutting the Aisle Queue

Few travel-etiquette debates produce as many arguments as what passengers should do immediately after a plane lands. People discuss who should stand up, when bags should be removed from the overhead bins and whether everyone should wait for the rows ahead to leave first.

Now, I don’t think standing up is automatically rude. People may need to stretch after sitting for hours, while others have painful knees or backs, want to retrieve their belongings or are worried about a short connection.

The more irritating behaviors are blocking the aisle, pushing forward and cutting in front of passengers in the rows ahead. People who crowd the aisle and attempt to move forward have even acquired the viral nickname aisle lice.

Airplane etiquette disagreements can begin long before deboarding. Even one passenger’s garlic chicken started an argument about food smells, personal comfort and what people should be allowed to eat inside a shared cabin.

In an account posted on Reddit, one traveler said several passengers repeatedly moved ahead whenever they saw a gap during deplaning.

As the line approached his row, the traveler stood in the aisle and used his body to prevent the passengers behind him from passing. But he did not simply stand there and wait.

He asked the other people in his row whether they needed help retrieving their luggage. He removed their bags from the overhead bins one by one, waited for each person to leave, and then turned to the passengers across the aisle and helped them too.

The entire process reportedly took approximately 45 seconds, but it allowed both rows to exit before the people waiting behind them could move ahead.

Many readers found the response satisfying because no one was harmed and the passenger helped other people. Instead of arguing with the queue-cutters, he made sure that the passengers who should have left first were able to do so.

Critics pointed out that someone rushing forward might have a tight connection, a medical issue or another reason that is not obvious to the people around them. There is, however, a difference between moving quickly into an empty aisle and physically pushing past passengers who are already trying to leave their rows.

The traveler believed he was restoring airplane deboarding etiquette. Others disliked the idea of one passenger appointing himself responsible for enforcing it.

5. Passengers Confronted a Man Who Wanted to Board Ahead of a Family

From what I discovered, queue disputes are happening at different moments of a flight. In January 2026, a United Airlines passenger sparked another argument, this time about boarding priority and airport etiquette.

The man, who was believed to hold the airline’s invitation-only Global Services status, was filmed standing behind a family of four while their boarding passes and passports were being checked. He appeared visibly irritated and repeatedly asked the gate agent to let him go ahead of them.

The gate agent continued dealing with the family. The father turned around and tried to explain that general boarding had already been called, but the man continued arguing.

Then other passengers joined the discussion.

The Independent reported that one passenger farther back asked the man what was wrong with him. The woman recording the encounter told him to calm down, but he continued insisting that there was an established order for boarding.

The airport was not identified in the report. The incident reportedly took place on January 2, and the video was posted online two days later.

An etiquette expert interviewed by the publication said that airline status did not give a passenger permission to behave rudely or act as though normal courtesy no longer applied.

The passengers didn’t touch the man, interfere with his belongings or invent a punishment. They challenged his behavior publicly, which may have stopped him from continuing to pressure the family or the gate agent. At the same time, several people joining an already tense exchange could have made the situation even more heated.

Would you have said something from the queue, or would you have stayed out of the argument?

6. Barcelona Anti-Tourism Protesters Sprayed Visitors With Water Pistols

The previous responses came from irritated hotel guests or airline passengers. In Barcelona, the pushback came from residents who believed mass tourism was changing daily life in their city.

On July 6, 2024, thousands of people joined an anti-tourism protest through central Barcelona. Some demonstrators carried brightly colored water pistols and sprayed people they identified as foreign tourists, including visitors sitting at outdoor restaurant tables.

Other protesters placed red tape around hotel and restaurant entrances while carrying signs calling for a reduction in tourism. The pictures and videos of tourists being sprayed soon traveled much farther than the march itself.

Reuters reported that fewer than a dozen demonstrators were seen spraying tourists in its video footage. Spain’s tourism minister later condemned their actions and said they did not represent the country’s culture of hospitality.

CBS News reported that diners changed tables to escape the water while some restaurants were symbolically taped off.

The protest was connected to wider concerns about housing costs, short-term vacation rentals, overcrowding and the effect of large visitor numbers on residential neighborhoods. Those are serious concerns, especially for people who live in popular areas throughout the year rather than visiting for a few days.

Yet the people who got wet were individual visitors eating, walking or sightseeing. They were not the landlords, policymakers or tourism companies whose decisions the demonstrators wanted to influence.

That is why the water-pistol protest divided people. Supporters saw a relatively harmless act that drew international attention to local housing and overtourism concerns, while critics saw tourists being blamed for decisions they hadn’t made.

Barcelona is not the only place where visitor expectations and local life have collided. In Serina, Italy, complaints about cowbells led to a special ordinance and a very public defense of a local tradition.

In Greece, a viral video of a Paros waiter carrying wine through the sea started another argument about tourist expectations, working conditions and how far a business should go to satisfy paying customers.

Was spraying visitors a small inconvenience that delivered an effective message, or did the protesters target the wrong people?

ID 194334809 | Angry Tourist ©Info723783 | Dreamstime.com 

7. A Passenger Climbed Into an Overhead Bin – Then He Missed the Flight

Some inconsiderate travel behavior begins with a complaint, an argument or an attempt to get ahead of other people. This case – and I wrote a detailed article here – appears to have begun as a joke.

In April 2026, a passenger on a Ryanair aircraft traveling from Malta to Naples filmed himself climbing into an overhead luggage compartment. The video showed him standing on a seat, pulling himself into the bin and shouting while other passengers reacted around him.

The TikTok caption presented the stunt as a way to avoid paying for the return trip to Naples, although it was unclear whether the passenger had seriously expected to hide there. Considering the size of the compartment and the number of people watching him, that would have been rather difficult.

A second video showed him inside an airport terminal, visibly upset after missing the flight. He screamed and pushed over part of a queue barrier while someone filmed him.

NDTV reported, citing aviation reporting, that cabin crew instructed the passenger to leave the overhead compartment and removed him from the aircraft before departure.

Ryanair had not publicly confirmed the individual details of the case when the reports were published. The company had, however, recently reiterated its zero-tolerance policy toward disruptive passenger behavior and warned that consequences can include removal, travel bans and financial claims.

Overhead bins are designed for approved cabin baggage, not people. Climbing inside could damage the compartment, delay boarding or create a safety problem for passengers seated below it. It is also one of the things you should not do on a plane, no matter how amusing the video may appear online.

In this case, airline intervention appears to have ended the stunt. The passenger didn’t get the reaction he seemed to expect: he remained at the airport while the flight continued without him.

8. Beach Destinations Are Restricting Giant Tents and Reserved Spaces

Travelers are not the only ones becoming frustrated. Cities and beach destinations are also introducing restrictions when certain vacation habits begin affecting safety, space and other visitors.

Large tents, canopies and cabanas have become increasingly common on public beaches. They can provide valuable shade for children, older visitors and people who can’t spend hours in direct sunlight, so it is easy to understand why families bring them.

The disagreement usually begins when enormous structures occupy a large area of sand, block the view of the water or are placed directly in front of other beachgoers. At crowded beaches and narrow coves, they can also prevent lifeguards from seeing swimmers clearly.

The debate isn’t limited to California. Other destinations are introducing stricter beach controls, including expanded sunbed restrictions on environmentally sensitive beaches in Greece.

Laguna Beach in California introduced new restrictions in May 2026. The city’s official beach-rules page states that only umbrellas are permitted across most city beaches, while larger canopies and easy-up structures are allowed only in designated zones at Main Beach and Aliso Beach.

The rule is not simply a response to beachgoers disliking an obstructed view. Officials said that large structures can interfere with lifeguards’ line of sight, creating a safety problem when they need to watch the ocean.

ABC7 reported before the rule took effect that violations could result in fines of up to $500. We could say that this is part of a wider movement in which destinations use regulations and tourist fines to control behavior that blocks public spaces, affects residents or creates safety concerns.

Still, not everyone will be happy. Families who rely on substantial shade may consider the limits inconvenient, particularly if the designated areas are far from where they want to sit. At the same time, one family’s shelter should not block the view, space or safety of everyone around it.

9. Carnival Warns Disruptive Cruise Passengers About Removal and a $500 Charge

On a cruise ship, passengers share restaurants, pools, corridors, entertainment areas and queues with thousands of other people. Unlike someone on a beach who can move farther down the sand, a cruise guest may spend days encountering the same passengers and the same behavior.

Carnival Cruise Line has published what can happen when that behavior begins affecting other guests or crew members. Its official code of conduct asks passengers to supervise children, keep hallway noise to a minimum, respect queues and show consideration toward other people using the ship’s shared spaces.

The company states that disruptive behavior affecting the comfort, enjoyment, safety or well-being of passengers or crew members will not be tolerated. Possible consequences include a $500 charge, confinement to the passenger’s stateroom and removal from the ship.

A disruptive guest may also be disembarked at their own expense and banned from traveling with the cruise line again. The passenger could also be held responsible for additional expenses connected with being detained or removed.

The accompanying cruise ticket contract says that guests agree to follow the code throughout their trip and describes the $500 charge connected with violations of the company’s zero-tolerance policy or conduct rules.

The published rules cover disruptive conduct broadly, so this doesn’t mean that every passenger who steps ahead in a buffet line will immediately receive a $500 charge. The response depends on what happened, whether the person followed crew instructions and how seriously the behavior affected other people.

It seems that these rules do need to be repeated and updated, especially when we consider recent incidents such as the passenger who used a dining fork to scratch her bare foot inside a cruise-ship restaurant. Another guest saw what she was doing and intervened.

The fork incident later prompted a public response from Carnival, but only after the video had spread and viewers demanded to know what the cruise line would do.

Cruise companies aren’t alone in imposing serious consequences. Airlines have also issued passenger bans when behavior crosses safety rules or when someone refuses to follow employee instructions.

Of course, published rules help only when they are actually enforced. A code of conduct doesn’t help a guest who can’t sleep because of hallway noise if nobody responds to the complaint.

Why Rude Tourist Behavior Stories Spread So Quickly

Stories about rude tourist behavior receive so much attention because many people can imagine themselves in the same situation. Almost everyone has been near a loudspeaker on a beach, an empty lounger reserved for hours, a hotel room that never seems to become silent or a passenger who believes the normal queue does not apply to them.

When someone finally reacts, people want to see what happened. Some support the response immediately, while others begin pointing out everything that could have gone wrong.

Other viral travel stories begin with fear or disbelief rather than bad etiquette. Millions watched after a woman taped her valuables to her body in Paris because she was worried about pickpockets.

In Italy, visitors paid to enter what they had been told was a Roman amphitheater before the extraordinary story behind the supposed attraction became public.

The situations are very different, but they create the same reaction. People imagine being there and immediately start deciding what they would have done.

Conclusion: When Fighting Rude Tourist Behavior Creates Another Problem

Several of the responses above are easy to understand, but understanding someone’s frustration doesn’t automatically justify everything they did afterward.

The hotel pranks were complicated. The fake-breakfast call involved an innocent employee, while the radio blasting static may have disturbed people in more than one room. The people responsible for the original noise were not necessarily the only ones affected.

The itching-powder revenge carried the greatest personal risk. A substance placed on someone’s towel could reach the wrong guest or cause a more serious reaction than expected.

The Barcelona protest raised a different question. The water pistols drew worldwide attention to residents’ concerns, but the people being sprayed were individual visitors rather than the companies, property owners or authorities shaping the city’s tourism model.

In the Ryanair overhead-bin case, employees appear to have handled the situation directly by removing the passenger before departure. No other traveler needed to create a punishment, and the flight continued without him.

Rules are useful only when they are enforced. Several people in these stories claimed that they had already complained or tried asking politely before deciding to retaliate, which is probably one reason so many readers supported them.

Watching someone finally react can feel satisfying from a distance. Being there when the confrontation escalates would be very different.

What would you do: speak up, ask an employee to intervene, ignore the behavior or create your own solution?

Rude Tourist Behavior: What You Can Do and What the Rules Allow

What is considered rude tourist behavior?

Rude tourist behavior includes actions that disregard shared spaces, local rules, employees or other visitors. Common examples include reserving unused loungers, making excessive noise, cutting queues, blocking public areas, ignoring crew instructions and treating hospitality employees disrespectfully.

How should you deal with rude tourists?

The safest first step is usually to avoid retaliation and ask hotel staff, airline crew, security employees or local authorities to intervene. A direct and polite request may work when the situation feels safe, but tampering with belongings or creating another disturbance can make the conflict worse.

Is it acceptable to move towels from reserved sun loungers?

Hotel policies vary. Some properties allow employees to remove belongings after a lounger has been unattended for a stated period. Instead of moving another guest’s property yourself, check the posted pool rules or ask a hotel employee to handle it.

What should you do about noisy hotel guests?

Contact the front desk and explain when the noise began and how long it has continued. Ask whether employees can warn the guests, move you to another room or provide another solution. Creating retaliatory noise may disturb additional rooms and make the original problem more difficult to resolve.

Why did Barcelona protesters spray tourists with water pistols?

Some participants in Barcelona’s July 2024 anti-tourism protest used water pistols to draw attention to concerns about housing costs, short-term vacation rentals, overcrowding and the effect of mass tourism on local neighborhoods. The tactic attracted international attention but was criticized for targeting individual visitors.

Can an airline remove a passenger for disruptive behavior?

Airlines can refuse transportation or remove a passenger when the person refuses crew instructions, creates a safety concern or seriously disrupts boarding or the flight. The exact consequences depend on the airline’s conditions of carriage, local law and what happened.

Can a cruise line remove a disruptive passenger?

Yes. Cruise contracts and codes of conduct may allow the company to confine a passenger to their cabin, disembark them, impose stated charges, recover additional expenses or prohibit them from booking future cruises.

Violeta Loredana

Violeta-Loredana Pascal is a communications expert, business mentor, and the founder of Earth’s Attractions and PRwave INTERNATIONAL. A pioneer in the Romanian digital PR landscape since 2005, she holds a degree in Communication and Social Sciences from SNSPA Bucharest. Violeta is a senior trainer at AcademiadeAfaceri.ro, where she leverages over 20 years of experience to teach professional courses in PR strategy and workplace productivity. By blending high-level business consulting with a passion for holistic travel and wellness, she empowers solopreneurs to overcome procrastination, build profitable brands, and design a life of purposeful adventure.